Changeset - b554f1fbc443
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Andras Gilyen - 8 years ago 2017-09-08 17:09:07
gilyen@clayoquot.swat.cwi.nl
Incr.
1 file changed with 5 insertions and 3 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
main.tex
Show inline comments
 
@@ -53,24 +53,26 @@
 
\newcommand{\bigO}[1]{\mathcal O\left(#1\right)}
 
\newcommand{\Res}[1]{\#\mathrm{Res}\left(#1\right)}
 

	
 
\newcommand{\QMAo}{\textsf{QMA$_1$}}
 
\newcommand{\BQP}{\textsf{BQP}}
 
\newcommand{\NP}{\textsf{NP}}
 
\newcommand{\SharpP}{\textsf{\# P}}
 

	
 
\newcommand{\diam}[1]{\mathcal{D}\left(#1\right)}
 
\newcommand{\paths}[1]{\mathcal{P}\left(#1\to\mathbf{1}\right)}
 
\newcommand{\start}[1]{\textsc{start}\left(#1\right)}
 
\newcommand{\initone}[1]{\textsc{InitOne}\left(#1\right)}
 
\newcommand{\patch}[1]{\textsc{Patch}\left(#1\right)}
 
\newcommand{\patches}[1]{\textsc{Patches}\left(#1\right)}
 
\newcommand{\maxgap}[1]{\mathrm{maxgap}\left(#1\right)}
 
\newcommand{\gaps}[1]{#1_{\mathrm{gaps}}}
 
\renewcommand{\P}{\mathbb{P}}
 
\newcommand{\E}{\mathbb{E}}
 
\newcommand{\NZ}[1]{\mathrm{NZ}^{(#1)}}
 
\newcommand{\Z}[1]{\mathrm{Z}^{(#1)}}
 
%\newcommand{\dist}[1]{d_{\!\!\not\,#1}}
 
\newcommand{\dist}[1]{d_{\neg #1}}
 

	
 
\newcommand{\todo}[1]{{\color{red}\textbf{TODO:} #1}}
 

	
 
\long\def\ignore#1{}
 
@@ -785,30 +787,30 @@ The following lemma considers two vertices $v,w$ that are never ``crossed'' so t
 
            \P^{[v,w]}(\start{b_1}) \right)
 
            \\ &\qquad \cdot
 
           \left( \sum_{b_2\in\{0,1\}^{[w,v]}}
 
            \P^{[w,v]}_{b_2}(\mathrm{NZ}^{(v,w)}\cap B)
 
            \P^{[w,v]}(\start{b_2}) \right) \\
 
        &=  \P^{[v,w]}_{b_v=b_w=1}(\mathrm{NZ}^{(v,w)}\cap A) \cdot
 
            \P^{[w,v]}(\mathrm{NZ}^{(v,w)}\cap B)
 
    \end{align*}
 
    The second equality follows in a similar way.
 
\end{proof}
 

	
 
	\begin{definition}[Connected patches]
 
		Let $P\subseteq V$ be a connected component of $G$. We say that $P$ is a patch of a particular run of the process if $P$ is a maximal connected component of the vertices that have ever become $0$ before termination. We denote the set of patches of a run by $\mathcal{P}$. For a patch $P$ let $P\in \mathcal{P}$ denote the event that one of the patches is equal to $P$. 
 
		Let $P\subseteq V$ be a connected component of $G$. We say that $P$ is a patch of a particular run of the process if $P$ is a maximal connected component of the vertices that have ever become $0$ before termination. We denote the set of patches of a run by $\mathcal{P}$. For a patch $P$ let $\patch{P}$ denote the event that one of the patches is equal to $P$. 
 
		In other words
 
		\begin{align*}
 
		P\in\mathcal{P} := \NZ{\overline{\partial}P} \cap \Z{P}.
 
		\patch{P} := \NZ{\overline{\partial}P} \cap \Z{P}.
 
		\end{align*}
 
		For $\mathcal{I}'\subseteq 2^{2^V}$ a set of patches we denote by $\mathcal{P}'\in \mathcal{P}$ the event that $\mathcal{P}'$ is a subset of the patches, i.e.,
 
		For a set of patches $\mathcal{P}$ 	</i>
 
		\begin{align*}
 
			\mathcal{P}'\in \mathcal{P} := \bigcup_{P\in \mathcal{P}'}\NZ{\overline{\partial}P} \cap \Z{P}.
 
		\end{align*}
 
	\end{definition} 
 

	
 
	We are often going to use the observation that we can partition the event $\Z{v}$ using patches:
 
	\begin{align*}
 
	\Z{v} = \dot\bigcup_{P\text{ patch } : v\in P} (P\in\mathcal{P})
 
	\end{align*}
 

	
 
The intuition of the following lemma is that the far right can only affect the zero vertex if there is an interaction chain forming, which means that every vertex should get resampled to $0$ at least once.
 
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma:probIndepNewGen}
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)