- Every arriving data message will immediately be used to identify the sender as the peer of the corresponding `get`ter port. Since messages between components arrive in order this allows us to detect when the `put`s are in a different order at the sender as the `get`s at the receiver.

## Handling Fatal Component Errors

Components may, during their execution, encounter errors that prevent them from continuing executing their code. For the purposes of this chapter we may consider these to occur during two particular phases of their execution:

1. The error occurs outside of a sync-block.

2. The error occurs anywhere inside of a sync-block. Or more specifically: the error occurs inside of a sync-block where the component has already performed an interaction with the outside world (i.e. performed a `put` or a `get`, **note:** I need to think about whether a select block influences the error-handling as well).

### Handling Fatal Errors outside of Synchronous Rounds

In the first case we're dealing with a component that has finished previous interactions with the outside world. So it does not have to deal with submitting the fact that a sync round has finished to the outside world. And so the component will perhaps log something to `stdout` to indicate that it has failed, but apart from that it will simply initiate the exit procedure as described earlier: reporting to all peers that the ports will be closed.

There is one more remark that should be made here. Although the component `E` that has encountered the error might not be part of a sync round, another component `C` might have sent a message to component `E`. If the message is being sent from `C` while it has already received the information from `E` that it port should be closed, then `C` needs to handle the error as well.

Hence, if the component `E` encounters a critical error, while there are still data messages from component `C` in the inbox (and the corresponding port is not yet closed), then component `E` sends a `DeliveryFailed` message to `C`. We may annotate each sent data message with the origin of the message in the PDL source, such that we can send this annotation back to the sender. Once the `DeliveryFailed` message arrives at `C` there are two possible scenarios (consider that it has sent a message, hence must have done this in a sync round that has not yet finished):

1. It is still waiting on the conclusion to a synchronous round that, if it were not for component `E`, would have succeeded. In this case the component `C` prints the `put`-error, and initiates failure in the synchronous round (we'll come back to this later in the other subchapter).

2. It is not waiting for the conclusion of a synchronous round, because after sending some other component (maybe even `C` itself) experienced a fatal error. It received the notification of the failed synchronous round first, hence is busy shutting down. In this case the component likely already printed an error, hence can ignore the `DeliveryFailed` message and continue shutting down.