Files
@ ce98be9707a6
Branch filter:
Location: CSY/reowolf/src/runtime2/consensus.rs
ce98be9707a6
8.1 KiB
application/rls-services+xml
wip on refactoring component
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 |
use crate::protocol::eval::ValueGroup;
use crate::runtime2::branch::{BranchId, ExecTree, QueueKind};
use crate::runtime2::ConnectorId;
use crate::runtime2::inbox2::{DataHeader, SyncHeader};
use crate::runtime2::port::PortIdLocal;
use crate::runtime2::scheduler::ComponentCtxFancy;
use super::inbox2::PortAnnotation;
struct BranchAnnotation {
port_mapping: Vec<PortAnnotation>,
}
/// The consensus algorithm. Currently only implemented to find the component
/// with the highest ID within the sync region and letting it handle all the
/// local solutions.
///
/// The type itself serves as an experiment to see how code should be organized.
// TODO: Flatten all datastructures
pub(crate) struct Consensus {
highest_connector_id: ConnectorId,
branch_annotations: Vec<BranchAnnotation>,
}
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub(crate) enum Consistency {
Valid,
Inconsistent,
}
impl Consensus {
pub fn new() -> Self {
return Self {
highest_connector_id: ConnectorId::new_invalid(),
branch_annotations: Vec::new(),
}
}
// --- Controlling sync round and branches
/// Sets up the consensus algorithm for a new synchronous round. The
/// provided ports should be the ports the component owns at the start of
/// the sync round.
pub fn start_sync(&mut self, ports: &[PortIdLocal]) {
debug_assert!(self.branch_annotations.is_empty());
debug_assert!(!self.highest_connector_id.is_valid());
// We'll use the first "branch" (the non-sync one) to store our ports,
// this allows cloning if we created a new branch.
self.branch_annotations.push(BranchAnnotation{
port_mapping: ports.iter()
.map(|v| PortAnnotation{
port_id: *v,
registered_id: None,
expected_firing: None,
})
.collect(),
});
}
/// Notifies the consensus algorithm that a new branch has appeared. Must be
/// called for each forked branch in the execution tree.
pub fn notify_of_new_branch(&mut self, parent_branch_id: BranchId, new_branch_id: BranchId) {
// If called correctly. Then each time we are notified the new branch's
// index is the length in `branch_annotations`.
debug_assert!(self.branch_annotations.len() == new_branch_id.index as usize);
let parent_branch_annotations = &self.branch_annotations[parent_branch_id.index as usize];
let new_branch_annotations = BranchAnnotation{
port_mapping: parent_branch_annotations.port_mapping.clone(),
};
self.branch_annotations.push(new_branch_annotations);
}
/// Notifies the consensus algorithm that a branch has reached the end of
/// the sync block. A final check for consistency will be performed that the
/// caller has to handle
pub fn notify_of_finished_branch(&self, branch_id: BranchId) -> Consistency {
let branch = &self.branch_annotations[branch_id.index as usize];
for mapping in &branch.port_mapping {
match mapping.expected_firing {
Some(expected) => {
if expected != mapping.registered_id.is_some() {
// Inconsistent speculative state and actual state
debug_assert!(mapping.registered_id.is_none()); // because if we did fire on a silent port, we should've caught that earlier
return Consistency::Inconsistent;
}
},
None => {},
}
}
return Consistency::Valid;
}
/// Notifies the consensus algorithm that a particular branch has assumed
/// a speculative value for its port mapping.
pub fn notify_of_speculative_mapping(&mut self, branch_id: BranchId, port_id: PortIdLocal, does_fire: bool) -> Consistency {
let branch = &mut self.branch_annotations[branch_id.index as usize];
for mapping in &mut branch.port_mapping {
if mapping.port_id == port_id {
match mapping.expected_firing {
None => {
// Not yet mapped, perform speculative mapping
mapping.expected_firing = Some(does_fire);
return Consistency::Valid;
},
Some(current) => {
// Already mapped
if current == does_fire {
return Consistency::Valid;
} else {
return Consistency::Inconsistent;
}
}
}
}
}
unreachable!("notify_of_speculative_mapping called with unowned port");
}
pub fn end_sync(&mut self, branch_id: BranchId, final_ports: &mut Vec<PortIdLocal>) {
todo!("write");
}
// --- Handling messages
/// Prepares a message for sending. Caller should have made sure that
/// sending the message is consistent with the speculative state.
pub fn prepare_message(&mut self, branch_id: BranchId, source_port_id: PortIdLocal, value: &ValueGroup) -> (SyncHeader, DataHeader) {
if cfg!(debug_assertions) {
let branch = &self.branch_annotations[branch_id.index as usize];
let port = branch.port_mapping.iter()
.find(|v| v.port_id == source_port_id)
.unwrap();
debug_assert!(port.expected_firing == None || port.expected_firing == Some(true));
}
}
pub fn handle_received_sync_header(&mut self, sync_header: &SyncHeader, ctx: &mut ComponentCtxFancy) {
todo!("should check IDs and maybe send sync messages");
}
/// Checks data header and consults the stored port mapping and the
/// execution tree to see which branches may receive the data message's
/// contents.
///
/// This function is generally called for freshly received messages that
/// should be matched against previously halted branches.
pub fn handle_received_data_header(&mut self, exec_tree: &ExecTree, data_header: &DataHeader, target_ids: &mut Vec<BranchId>) {
for branch in exec_tree.iter_queue(QueueKind::AwaitingMessage) {
if branch.awaiting_port == data_header.target_port {
// Found a branch awaiting the message, but we need to make sure
// the mapping is correct
if self.branch_can_receive(branch.id, data_header) {
target_ids.push(branch.id);
}
}
}
}
pub fn notify_of_received_message(&mut self, branch_id: BranchId, data_header: &DataHeader) {
debug_assert!(self.branch_can_receive(branch_id, data_header));
let branch = &mut self.branch_annotations[branch_id.index as usize];
for mapping in &mut branch.port_mapping {
if mapping.port_id == data_header.target_port {
mapping.registered_id = Some(data_header.new_mapping);
return;
}
}
// If here, then the branch didn't actually own the port? Means the
// caller made a mistake
unreachable!("incorrect notify_of_received_message");
}
/// Matches the mapping between the branch and the data message. If they
/// match then the branch can receive the message.
pub(crate) fn branch_can_receive(&self, branch_id: BranchId, data_header: &DataHeader) -> bool {
let annotation = &self.branch_annotations[branch_id.index as usize];
for expected in &data_header.expected_mapping {
// If we own the port, then we have an entry in the
// annotation, check if the current mapping matches
for current in &annotation.port_mapping {
if expected.port_id == current.port_id {
if expected.registered_id != current.registered_id {
// IDs do not match, we cannot receive the
// message in this branch
return false;
}
}
}
}
return true;
}
}
|